Compare › Traccia
RunVouch vs Traccia
Traccia is an AI agent control plane: traces, cost attribution, PII detection, policy enforcement and evals, from one SDK init call. RunVouch sits outside the stack: it does not see inside the run, it checks that the run happened, finished, produced evidence and stayed under budget.
| Traccia | RunVouch | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it lives | inside your code (traccia.init(), SDK per framework) | outside: wraps the command, or two HTTP calls |
| Traces, spans, prompt registry, evals | yes | no |
| Cost attribution per agent and model | yes, from spans | per run, as reported by the wrapper or your call |
| Policy enforcement, PII masking, model restrictions | yes, hard blocks mid-execution on higher tiers | no |
| Spend limit with hard cap | Enterprise tier, per the pricing table | every plan, including free: cap per run and per day, agent paused |
| Missed-run / dead man's switch | no | yes |
| Evidence the task was done | no | yes: file, URL or assertion required, else NO_EVIDENCE |
| Third-party verifiable proof of the run record | compliance evidence export | public hash chain, Bitcoin-anchored |
| Pricing | free 50K events, 7-day retention; $99 / $299 / $799 per month; enterprise custom | free 3 agents; $9 / $29 |
When to use which
Traccia is for a team running many agents in production that needs governance inside the stack: who called what, at what cost, with which policy. RunVouch is for anyone with agents on a schedule who needs to know they ran and were done, without instrumenting anything. If your worry is "the routine stopped and nobody noticed" or "it ran up $1,800 overnight", the watchdog outside the process is the cheaper answer; Traccia's hard spend cap starts at Enterprise, RunVouch's is on the free plan.