Compare › Sentry Crons
RunVouch vs Sentry Crons
Sentry Crons adds scheduled-job monitoring to Sentry error tracking. RunVouch is for jobs whose failure is not an exception: empty output, loops, overspend.
| Sentry Crons | RunVouch | |
|---|---|---|
| Missed / late run alerts | yes | yes |
| Exceptions with stack traces | yes, with the Sentry SDK | stderr excerpt only |
| Evidence the task was done | no | yes |
| Retry-storm (loop) detection | no | yes |
| Cost and token caps | no | yes |
| Output/duration drift | no (duration thresholds only) | yes |
| Requires SDK in your code | yes (or curl check-ins) | no, wrap the command |
| Self-host | yes (Sentry self-hosted) | yes (MIT) |
| Price | included in Sentry plans; per-monitor quota | free 3 agents; $19 / $99 |
When to use which
Already on Sentry and your jobs fail by throwing? Use Sentry Crons. Agents mostly fail without throwing; that is the case RunVouch is built for. They coexist fine.
Other comparisons
vs Better Stack: One vendor for uptime vs one job done well. vs Uptime Kuma: Self-hosted push monitor vs agent watchdog. vs Cronhub: Cron monitor vs LLM job monitor. Not sure which category you need at all? Start at observability, a heartbeat, or a watchdog, or see all comparisons.